Composites and companion coatings
PTFE codeposition: the low friction composite deposit
PTFE particles suspended in an electroless nickel-phosphorus bath give a deposit that combines a hard matrix with the slipperiest solid commonly available. This note sets out the polymer’s measured properties, the 1966 origin of codeposition, and the honest limits of what the public references say.

Why a plating bath wants a slippery particle
An electroless nickel-phosphorus deposit is chosen for hardness, uniform thickness on complex geometry, and corrosion protection. What it does not offer by itself is a low coefficient of friction. The standard answer on a finishing line is to suspend fine solid particles in the bath so that the growing nickel layer surrounds and embeds them, producing a composite. Silicon carbide buys hardness; PTFE buys slip. The two particles sit at opposite ends of the composite family covered in our page on composites and companion coatings, and they are specified for different failure modes.
PTFE, polytetrafluoroethylene, is a synthetic fluoropolymer of tetrafluoroethylene consisting wholly of carbon and fluorine. It was discovered by accident in 1938 by Roy J. Plunkett at a DuPont plant in New Jersey, when a pressurized cylinder of tetrafluoroethylene gas stopped losing weight and turned out to be lined with a waxy white solid. The full history, from the Manhattan Project to non-stick pans, is on the PTFE reference page; here we keep to the properties a specifier needs.
The friction number, and its caveat
The figure everyone quotes for PTFE is a coefficient of friction of 0.05 to 0.10, described as one of the lowest of any solid. The caveat matters: the reference states that the coefficient of friction of plastics is usually measured against polished steel. It is a laboratory configuration, not a statement about any arbitrary counterface, and the page does not publish a friction value for a nickel-phosphorus PTFE composite specifically. Anyone promising a composite friction number from these sources is extrapolating, and a purchase order should not be written against an extrapolation.
The low friction has a physical cause. Fluorocarbons exhibit only small London dispersion forces because of the low electric polarizability of fluorine, which is also why PTFE is hydrophobic and why nothing sticks to it readily. It is, according to the reference, the only known surface to which a gecko cannot stick, a fact with no plating value but a memorable demonstration of the same chemistry the deposit relies on.
What the polymer can and cannot take
A composite deposit inherits the particle’s limits as well as its virtues, so the thermal boundaries deserve attention. PTFE melts at 327 °C (620 °F), but the reference gives a narrower working story: it begins to decompose at about 260 °C (500 °F) and through 350 °C (662 °F), with pyrolysis above 400 °C (752 °F). The main decomposition products are fluorocarbon gases, including tetrafluoroethylene, and difluorocarbene radicals. Depolymerization occurs above 650 to 700 °C, well past any condition a nickel composite would survive. For a coating that will see heat, 260 °C is the number to design against, not the melting point.
Chemical inertness is the other inheritance. The reference notes that the only chemicals known to affect PTFE’s carbon-fluorine bonds are highly reactive metals such as the alkali metals at higher temperatures, metals such as aluminium and magnesium, and fluorinating agents such as xenon difluoride and cobalt(III) fluoride. That is a short list, and it is why PTFE lines hoses and pipes carrying aggressive chemistry. Basic properties from the same page, for comparison:
| Property | Value |
|---|---|
| Density | 2200 kg/m3 |
| Melting point | 327 °C |
| Coefficient of friction | 0.05–0.10 |
| Glass temperature | 114.85 °C |
| Young’s modulus | 0.5 GPa |
| Thermal conductivity | 0.25 W/(m·K) |
One entry on that table should temper expectations: a Young’s modulus of 0.5 GPa. PTFE is a soft particle in a hard matrix, and it contributes compliance, not load-bearing capacity.
How codeposition got started
The technique of embedding particles in a growing metal layer was initially developed by Odekerken in 1966, for electrodeposited nickel-chromium coatings. In that study an intermediate layer carried finely powdered particles, including aluminum oxide and PVC resin, distributed within a metallic matrix. The first commercial application of the work was electroless nickel-silicon carbide on the Wankel internal combustion engine. A second commercial composite followed in 1981: nickel-phosphorus with PTFE. Our note on silicon carbide codeposition covers the hard side of that lineage.
The electroless process itself was discovered twice: by Charles Adolphe Wurtz in 1844, then rediscovered in 1946 by Abner Brenner and Grace E. Riddell at the National Bureau of Standards when nickel deposition exceeded the limit of Faraday’s law. Because the reduction of nickel by hypophosphite is autocatalytic, the layer grows evenly regardless of geometry, which is exactly what a particle-filled deposit needs: the metal forms around each particle rather than shadowing it.
Why PTFE is the difficult particle
The reference on electroless nickel states plainly that the co-deposition of diamond and PTFE particles was more difficult than that of aluminum oxide or silicon carbide. It does not explain the mechanism, and it does not publish particle sizes, bath loadings, or volume fractions for the commercial composite. That gap is worth stating to anyone comparing quotations: the public sources establish that Ni-P PTFE composites have been commercial since 1981, and stop there. Feasibility of incorporating a second phase of nanometer to micrometer particles is described as having initiated a new generation of composite coatings, but process details live in supplier documentation, not in the open reference.
Which matrix, and which honest unknowns
The matrix matters as much as the particle. Coatings below 7% phosphorus are microcrystalline solid solutions with grains 2 to 6 nm across; above 10% phosphorus they are amorphous, and between the two limits a mixture. High-phosphorus coatings, 10 to 14% P, are preferred for acidic corrosive environments, while medium-phosphorus baths, 4 to 10% P, are the most common type overall. Those boundaries are laid out in our note on phosphorus grades. No public value ties a specific phosphorus grade to a PTFE composite’s friction or wear life, so treat any such pairing on a data sheet as the vendor’s own measurement and ask for its condition.
Before writing the specification, verify two things against the supplier’s data: the particle content and size distribution actually deposited, since the open references give neither, and the temperature the assembly will see in service, against the 260 °C onset of decomposition. Both checks can be made from documents the shop already holds.
Entity note (en.wikipedia.org): the Wikipedia article on Polytetrafluoroethylene is a general encyclopedia entry covering the polymer’s discovery, chemistry, production, properties table, applications, safety, and environmental record. It gives measured values such as density, melting point, and coefficient of friction, and it is explicit when a figure carries a measurement condition, such as friction against polished steel. It is not a plating process source: it does not discuss codeposition parameters.
PTFE codeposition: the low friction composite deposit: the 2 sources used
- Polytetrafluoroethylene (Wikipedia) · https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polytetrafluoroethylene
- Electroless nickel-phosphorus plating (Wikipedia) · https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electroless_nickel-phosphorus_plating